When Amendments were first ratified, everyone knew exactly how to interpret their meaning. Then Americans got stupid (it’s mostly Jimmy Carter’s fault). It’s time to reeducate America on what the Amendments meant to say.
—
Let’s face it, there’s no way a militia could defeat the entire US Military, rendering the 2nd Amendment as useless as waterboarding Aquaman (which is still only half as useless as Aquaman himself). We have to realize that our Founding Fathers wrote in a different time than ours, without the ability to foresee the existence of weapons like Atom Bombs, lasers, and Richard Simmons.

Aquaman's trident couldn't even put onedent in the military.
We have to take the intent of the 2nd Amendment into consideration, and that intent was to ensure a small to medium sized group of average citizens could compete with the US Military in the numbers and power of their armament.
Constitutionalists will argue that grenades and heat-seeking missiles can hardly be considered “arms” in the traditional sense, but come on people: it’s all about the intent of the amendment, not the literal meaning. Most politicians don’t seem to get this simple truth, which makes them even more useless than Aquaman (but still worth waterboarding).


How’s about writing the actual amendement. don’t make us do work to go read the thing and then come back that is as stupid as aquaman is gay……60%
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Second Amendment to the United States Constitution [wikipedia]
The Truth waits not for your sources.